The "do-gooder" does that which is good
by his lights. Yet by the lights of another, the do-gooder may
in fact do
evil. The do-gooder interferes with the status quo, he intervenes in a situation in which he is not a participant to perform
an act of good. But what will be the consequences for this single "good" act? Even by the lights of the do-gooder himself, might these consequences not themselves be
evil? Yet, how selective is the do-gooder's blindness towards these failings! ~ He cannot resist the urge to interfere again, to disrupt and perpetrate evil secure in the close-minded "knowledge" that he does good! The
wise Samaritan intervenes in a situation he
understands in a situation of which
he himself is a part.
No comments:
Post a Comment